Caught! Alleged Low Back Injury
CIC Case File #049784OH
The employer had suspicions that this man's back injury was not as debilitating as he said it was in his workers' compensation claim.
They hired CIC to conduct surveillance and we immediately found that he was not home during the morning hours. We then scheduled an early-morning surveillance and discovered that he was working for another company as a furniture deliveryman. Oddly enough, he claimed that his back injury was so severe that he couldn't even ride in a dump truck. He was obviously being dishonest.
Many times, with this type of case, we will pass on our evidence on to the Bureau of Workers' Compensation so they can use it to file fraud charges against the individual.
More Information Open a Case
Exclusive Video Footage
FTC Extends Enforcement Deadline of Identity Theft Red Flags Rule
At the request of several Members of Congress, the Federal Trade Commission is further delaying enforcement of the “Red Flags” Rule through December 31, 2010, while Congress considers legislation that would affect the scope of entities covered by the Rule. Today’s announcement and the release of an Enforcement Policy Statement do not affect other federal agencies’ enforcement of the original November 1, 2008 deadline for institutions subject to their oversight to be in compliance.
“Congress needs to fix the unintended consequences of the legislation establishing the Red Flags Rule – and to fix this problem quickly. We appreciate the efforts of Congressmen Barney Frank and John Adler for getting a clarifying measure passed in the House, and hope action in the Senate will be swift,” FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz said. “As an agency we’re charged with enforcing the law, and endless extensions delay enforcement.”
The Rule was developed under the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act, in which Congress directed the FTC and other agencies to develop regulations requiring “creditors” and “financial institutions” to address the risk of identity theft. The resulting Red Flags Rule requires all such entities that have “covered accounts” to develop and implement written identity theft prevention programs to help identify, detect, and respond to patterns, practices, or specific activities – known as “red flags” – that could indicate identity theft.
The Rule became effective on January 1, 2008, with full compliance for all covered entities originally required by November 1, 2008. The Commission has issued several Enforcement Policies delaying enforcement of the Rule. Most recently, the Commission announced in October 2009 that at the request of certain Members of Congress, it was delaying enforcement of the Rule until June 1, 2010, to allow Congress time to finalize legislation that would limit the scope of business covered by the Rule. Since then, the Commission has received another request from Members of Congress for another delay in enforcement of the Rule beyond June 1, 2010.
The Commission urges Congress to act quickly to pass legislation that will resolve any questions as to which entities are covered by the Rule and obviate the need for further enforcement delays. If Congress passes legislation limiting the scope of the Red Flags Rule with an effective date earlier than December 31, 2010, the Commission will begin enforcement as of that effective date.
In the interim, FTC staff has continued to provide guidance, both through materials posted on www.ftc.gov/redflagsrule, and in speeches and participation in seminars, conferences and other training events to numerous groups. The FTC also published a compliance guide for business, and created a template that enables low risk entities to create an identity theft program with an easy-to-use online form (www.ftc.gov/bcp/edu/microsites/redflagsrule/get-started.shtm). The FTC staff also has published numerous general and industry-specific articles, released a video explaining the Rule, and continues to respond to inquiries from the public. To assist further with compliance, FTC staff has worked with a number of trade associations that have chosen to develop model policies or specialized guidance for their members.
As was the case previously, this enforcement delay is limited to the Red Flags Rule and does not extend to the rule regarding address discrepancies applicable to users of consumer reports (16 C.F.R.§641), or to the rule regarding changes of address applicable to card issuers (16 C.F.R.§681.2).
The above article can be viewed on the Federal Trade Commission's website at www.ftc.gov
Latest Downloads
- CIC Countermeasures Case Study #2 (2010.05.28)
- CIC Countermeasures Case Study #1 (2010.05.28)
- CIC Countermeasures Brochure (2010.05.28)
What We Do
Corporate Investigations
- Employee theft
- Harassment
- Drugs in the workplace
Surveillance
- Workers’ compensation fraud
- FMLA fraud
- Covert video
Background Checks
- Pre-employment screening
- Random rechecks
- Business screening
Strike Management
- Security vulnerability assessments
- Pre-strike planning
- Guard staffing and management
Terminations
- Termination assistance
- Protection
- Post-termination employee evaluation
Tenant Screening
- Individual tenants
- Business tenants
Security Consulting
- Access control
- Physical security
- Site specific policies and procedures
Bug Detection
- Office sweeps
- Wire taps
- Other listening device detection
Executive Protection
- At residence
- Office
- Special events
Workplace Violence
- Prevention
- Emergency assistance
- Post event evaluation






Introduction
Surveillance
Investigation
Background Checks
Security Management
Bug Detection


